Major Cases

Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 3

Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 3

“Garo and Armen both showed us the models and all of the materials that had been made for the case. We were all set to go to trial, and we were able to see the quality of the material that was produced. We also got to see Garo and Armen in action, negotiating for us,… View Article
Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 2

Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 2

“It really takes a team effort to demonstrate what it is that he went through and what could potentially happen to him as he grows older”. “They employed a valuable Mardirossian Akaragian Technique to always prepare for a trial at every stage of the litigation process. Going the extra mile by investing time and money… View Article
Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 1

Doe V. County Of Los Angeles (2019) – Focus Highlight 1

“In the case of Doe versus the County of Los Angeles. The plaintiff and a friend were walking peacefully down Sunset Blvd, when they heard sirens approaching behind them.” “A patrol car driven by a Sheriff’s deputy along with the passenger next to him. And it was a response that he didn’t need to take… View Article
Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 4 (Final)

Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 4 (Final)

“My dad always has held Garo in high regard, and you can see that they have a genuine friendship. They joke around with each other. The fact that my dad feels so comfortable, it makes me feel comfortable. It makes everybody else in our family feel comfortable. It feels like a family. It really does…. View Article
Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 3

Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 3

“I remember, you know, Garo came by the house when he was explaining how, like, how, like they were trying to figure out the diagram of how the accident happened. And he did like a little diagram of showing us how it happened. Cause we didn’t understand. He was very, again hands-on and I was… View Article
Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 2

Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 2

In order to uncover the truth, top civil attorneys Garo Mardirossian and Armen Akaragian knew that they had to uncover the defects in the design of the manufacturing. ‘‘Now this one’s gonna be a battle, and major auto manufacturers don’t give in, in these kinds of cases and settle early at all they fight you,… View Article
Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 1

Pannu V. Land Rover (2011) — Focus Highlight 1

“We handle really major catastrophic incidents, whether it be a civil rights violation due to police brutality, or a serious injury due to a failure of a defectively designed product or defectively manufactured product.” “We step in, and we step in with full force. And we bring consistency to all our cases, consistency in the… View Article
Newsletter Volume #1

Newsletter Volume #1

We are proud to announce that Mardirossian & Associates Inc. has become Mardirossian Akaragian LLP, as Armen Akaragian becomes a partner. “Armen has been with me for over 20 years and he’s contributed immensely to my practice — the least I could do is add his name to it.” To accompany the new name and… View Article

MARDIROSSIAN AKARAGIAN LLP, 6311 WILSHIRE BLVD, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90048, UNITED STATES(323) 653-6311 [email protected]

© 2024 Mardirossian Akaragian LLP All rights reserved. | Design: Simply Friday

THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT. The information contained in this website does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter. Mardirossian Akaragian LLP, is responsible for the contents of this website. For more information, please click on the link to our Legal Disclaimer.

 Please note that the attorneys of this office are licensed to practice law in the State of California only.

Free Case Evaluation

    Name (required)

    Message (required)

    A brief description of your legal issue

    Disclaimer *

    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.